<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Public Option?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unsilentgeneration.com/2009/10/26/which-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unsilentgeneration.com/2009/10/26/which-public-option/</link>
	<description>A site for pissed-off progressive old folks...because we're not dead yet.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: euandus</title>
		<link>http://unsilentgeneration.com/2009/10/26/which-public-option/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>euandus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unsilentgeneration.com/?p=1981#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just posted on the alternatives...with respect to federalism.  ...a different angle, huh?  If you want to have a look, here is the link. I would argue that the consideration of health-care insurance reform alternatives ought to include an assessment of how consistent each is with federalism, for if we focus narrowly on the issue of the day without pausing to consider the impact on our system of governance, we will be unintentionally passing on a less perfect Union to our descendents.  If you are interested in my attempt, pls see http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/health-care-insurance-reform-a-spectrum-of-alternatives-with-respect-to-federalism/

You might also be interested in this NYT article: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/policy/27health.html?_r=1&amp;hp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just posted on the alternatives&#8230;with respect to federalism.  &#8230;a different angle, huh?  If you want to have a look, here is the link. I would argue that the consideration of health-care insurance reform alternatives ought to include an assessment of how consistent each is with federalism, for if we focus narrowly on the issue of the day without pausing to consider the impact on our system of governance, we will be unintentionally passing on a less perfect Union to our descendents.  If you are interested in my attempt, pls see <a href="http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/health-care-insurance-reform-a-spectrum-of-alternatives-with-respect-to-federalism/" rel="nofollow">http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/health-care-insurance-reform-a-spectrum-of-alternatives-with-respect-to-federalism/</a></p>
<p>You might also be interested in this NYT article:<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/policy/27health.html?_r=1&amp;hp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/27/health/policy/27health.html?_r=1&amp;hp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
